A Matter of Balance
In response to my Have bike, will pedal post, Fran asked:
It's actually something I've been meaning to blog about for a while now, but I've been trying to think of a way to explain the difference in balance between the two without being able to resort to hand gestures. (Also, since I'm not a physicist and haven't played one since high school, I don't know the technical terms.)
Have you ever kayaked? You know the way the boat responds as you dip and pull with the oar on the left side, then shift your balance towards the other side, then dip and pull on the other? You're proceeding forwards, but your forward momentum is affected by and dependent on a constant series of shifts to the left and right.
This same sort of process takes place when you're pedalling on a recumbent bicycle: you're pushing with one foot, then with the other, and because your legs are stretched out along the length of the bicycle, rather than positioned up-and-down at the bicycle's centre, the bicycle sways from side to side in response to the forces of your pedalling.
At very low speeds, yes, it's harder to balance because the forward momentum of the bicycle is not enough to overcome the pull of gravity and you don't have your own body's years of training in "behold, I am upright!" to overcome this.
Riding close alongside another bicycle, the constant shifting of a recumbent bicycle makes the probability of nudging your companion just that little bit more likely. Riding in a group, where the riders are riding in a paceline, taking turns at the front and then dropping back ... well, that's tricky to coordinate at the best of times.

Edit:
On the way to work this morning I was riding behind a guy on a mountain bike. His seat was too low, so his knees were sticking out like Prince Charles's ears, and he was riding very slowly. He was weaving side to side as a bicycle will do under such circumstances.
Which got me to thinking that the physics of an upright bike aren't that different to that of a recumbent. If you're riding hard on an upright bicycle, you'll see that the bike shifts from side to side in response to the forces being applied: it's just that your butt, not having to stay in the seat to support your body weight, doesn't need to follow it.
"Is it so much harder to balance on [a recumbent] than a road bike?"
It's actually something I've been meaning to blog about for a while now, but I've been trying to think of a way to explain the difference in balance between the two without being able to resort to hand gestures. (Also, since I'm not a physicist and haven't played one since high school, I don't know the technical terms.)
Have you ever kayaked? You know the way the boat responds as you dip and pull with the oar on the left side, then shift your balance towards the other side, then dip and pull on the other? You're proceeding forwards, but your forward momentum is affected by and dependent on a constant series of shifts to the left and right.
This same sort of process takes place when you're pedalling on a recumbent bicycle: you're pushing with one foot, then with the other, and because your legs are stretched out along the length of the bicycle, rather than positioned up-and-down at the bicycle's centre, the bicycle sways from side to side in response to the forces of your pedalling.
At very low speeds, yes, it's harder to balance because the forward momentum of the bicycle is not enough to overcome the pull of gravity and you don't have your own body's years of training in "behold, I am upright!" to overcome this.
Riding close alongside another bicycle, the constant shifting of a recumbent bicycle makes the probability of nudging your companion just that little bit more likely. Riding in a group, where the riders are riding in a paceline, taking turns at the front and then dropping back ... well, that's tricky to coordinate at the best of times.

Edit:
On the way to work this morning I was riding behind a guy on a mountain bike. His seat was too low, so his knees were sticking out like Prince Charles's ears, and he was riding very slowly. He was weaving side to side as a bicycle will do under such circumstances.
Which got me to thinking that the physics of an upright bike aren't that different to that of a recumbent. If you're riding hard on an upright bicycle, you'll see that the bike shifts from side to side in response to the forces being applied: it's just that your butt, not having to stay in the seat to support your body weight, doesn't need to follow it.


